Specifically, the proposed amendment states, “Only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Minnesota."
According to a recent report from the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board, the Catholic Archdiocese of Minneapolis & St. Paul and the Catholic Dioceses of New Ulm contributed $700,000 last year to support passage of this amendment. Half of that money, $350,000, was donated to Minnesota For Marriage, an organization that is spearheading the push to get the constitutional amendment approved.
According to Catholic World News, Archbishop John Nienstedt
and other church leaders in Minnesota are enthusiastically supporting this amendment
and he has warned his priests that open dissention will not be tolerated. One priest who has challenged the archbishop
on that point, Father Mike Tegeder, has reportedly been warned that he could be
suspended from ministry if he continues to oppose the amendment campaign.
The Catholic Spirit reported that as part of a statewide effort by the Catholic bishops of Minnesota, the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis provided $650,000 in 2011 to the Minnesota Catholic Conference for that organization’s activities to get the amendment on the ballot.More than 400,000 DVDs have been mailed to the homes of Minnesota Catholics, courtesy of Catholic bishops in the state. The 18-minute DVD includes an appearance by the Archbishop in which he says it is time for Minnesotans to vote on a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman.
So the question is this. How can this possibly not invalidate any claim the Catholic Church has to tax exemption?
Austin Cline provided an overview of the tax exemption laws in About.com. To paraphrase (emphasis mine):
Tax exemptions are not a right. No group or church is owed a tax exemption.
These exemptions on various taxes are not protected by the Constitution. They are created by and regulated by the
legislatures and can be taken away by them. Tax exemptions are provided in
exchange for groups’ providing services to the community. Church tax exemptions
are in jeopardy if they engage in direct political activity either
against or on behalf of a political candidate or in an
attempt to directly influence the passage of particular legislation. Losing
tax-exempt status can mean both having to pay income taxes and that donations
to the group will not be tax deductible by the donors.
This excerpt from the IRS Tax Guide for Religious Organizations describes what churches must do to retain their 501(c)(3) statuses that allow them to be tax exempt and allow people contributing to them to deduct the contribution.
In general, no organization, including
a church, may qualify for IRC section 501(c)(3) status if a substantial part of
its activities is attempting to influence legislation. Legislation includes … a referendum, ballot
initiative, constitutional amendment, or similar procedure. A church or religious organization will be
regarded as attempting to influence legislation … if the organization advocates
the adoption or rejection of legislation.
How could this be any clearer? The Catholic Church has attempted to influence whether or not the constitutional amendment is passed by contributing large amounts of money to lobbying organizations, by trying to influence voters who are members of the Church on how to vote, and by muzzling its own leaders’ ability to discuss the issue.
The Catholic Church must lose its tax exempt 501(c)(3) status, and contributions to the church by individual tax payers must not be deductable. This is a fight we must engage in if we expect the separation of church and state to mean anything.
